Fast Fashion Fertilizer

In our project, we will research what really happens to your donated clothes and conduct two experiments. One is burning various clothing items to find out if incineration is an effective method of disposing waste. We will then use the ash to grow plants.
Grade 7

Presentation

No video provided

Hypothesis

If clothing ash affects the plant growth, then the plants with the clothing ash will be taller and healthier then the controlled plant. More specifically, wool will be the tallest and denim will be the shortest. This is because burned clothing can be filled with rich nutrients to help the plant grow. Additionally, wool is a natural animal fabric and is the least processed, leading us to believe that it will help the plants grow taller and healthier. 

 

Research

 

SCIENCE FAIR  2024 Webber Academy, Research Paper  

CLOTHING
A BIG PROBLEM

___

By: Kaitlyn Joy & Karmen Dhillon

The Problem

You undoubtedly believe that when you donate clothes, they are being utilized in someone's home. In reality, the majority of your clothing, that is between 40% and 80%, is truly exported to underdeveloped nations abroad. Only ten to twenty percent is resold or down cycled into rags and insulation. Seventy percent ends up all around Africa’s shores and is left for the local population to deal with. “We dump our waste into their (developing countries) landfills''. (Paul Jay, 2018)  Apart from this, the way the clothing arrives there is even more shocking. Hence, we experimented with different textiles to find an environmentally safe way to dispose of unwanted, used clothing. Now, we are using the clothing’s ash to test how it works as fertilizer. Will it negatively affect plants’ growth or enhance it? We are researching characteristics of our manipulated variables and the main problem with donating unwanted clothes.

Ghana, an African nation with a population of 30 million, gets 15 million items of unwanted, worn clothing per week on its coasts. The country recycles 100 million items in four months as a result of having to figure out how to dispose of this waste. Due to a lack of available space, households of this community are turning into landfills. "Mountains of unusable, lower quality textile waste ," quote, "ending up in landfills. (Paul Jay, 2018). This quantity of clothing is sent to Africa primarily because the North continent's nations don't want to manage their own waste. Another reason is the continuous misconception that there is a grave shortage of clothing in the Global South. The primary resources are the United States of America, United Kingdom, and Canada.

In Kantamanto 30,000 people toil for 6 hours a week to sell, repair, and upcycle waste. Just some of these workers are Kayayei. Kayayei means she who carries burden. Their job is to travel neck breaking distances to deliver heavy bales of clothes, weighing 65 kg. In addition, "We see the spine of a 60 year old in a teenager's body"(Dr. Naa Asheley, 2021) despite the fact that they aren't even aware of their age. Kayayei are mostly mothers who also carry their children on their back. Although the legal working age in Ghana is 16, children work with their mothers. There have been unfortunate incidents where bales have fallen and crushed children’s skulls, due to the unsafe environment where they cling to their mother’s back.``Labor is physically backbreaking and spiritually dehumanizing.” (Liz Rickets, 2021). The result of all their hard work is 30 cents to $1 a trip.

About 10 million tonnes of clothing are discarded each year in Accra, Ghana with 3,000 tonnes entering the country every day. Disposal charges are $45 per tonne. The amount of mechanical and chemical recycling is increasing air pollution, energy demand, water use, and carbon footprints. Floods frequently happen because gutter systems are so clogged with garments. Even more microplastics are transported to the ocean by the flow of water. Toxic chemicals may be poured into streams during the sorting and dyeing of garments, further damaging water systems.

Characteristics Of Clothing

Some fabrics, mainly made of natural fibers like wool and cotton can naturally decay and don’t have as environmentally negative impact as polyesters or nylon.  Clothing is made by the threading of various fibers and that is normally identified on a clothing tag.  You will see blends such as 50% cotton/polyester. Various blends of fibers offer different types and quality of fabric desired by articles of clothing for various activities. It is these same types of blends that pose certain problems at the end of the clothing use or life cycle related to reuse, recycling or elimination. 

Cotton and silk are natural materials primarily made from cellulose. It grows naturally in warm climates and is a sustainable resource.  Cotton is absorbent, soft and comfortable to wear.  Cotton is easy to color or print and does not conduct electricity so it does not get staticy. Cotton is slow to dry and can be damaged by mildew or long term light exposure. This fabric heavily relies on the use of nitrogen for sufficient plant growth. Similar to wool, if garments are made from 100% cotton fibers they are recyclable as well as biodegradable.  

Wool is the most reusable and recyclable fiber on the planet.  This animal grown natural fiber varies slightly from type of animal or place of harvest but it all shares some of the most environmentally and sustainable characteristics.  Wool garments do not feel damp or clammy because of the fibers natural ability to either repeal or retain water.  It absorbs moisture from the air to reach an equilibrium allowing the wearer to feel comfortable and not wet or cold.  Natural fibers such as wool are much more biodegradable because fungi and bacteria through the process of decomposition allow for wool to become part of the natural carbon and nutrient cycle. Moths and carpet beetles eat wool. Clothing made of 100% wool can make recycling much easier because the material can be broken down and remade into a new item through a less complex process versus a blend of fibers. Wool is flame retardant and does not melt.

Textile Incineration

Disposal of textiles is a growing problem because the production of these clothes has become less expensive over time. Waiting for 40 or more years for synthetic clothing to decompose may not be a viable option of disposal because landfills are filling up at a rate faster than decomposition and many municipalities are running out of room.  Shipping these textiles to under developed nations is simply making someone else deal with our problem.  

The incineration of textile waste is a common method of disposal much quicker than decomposition. However, there are drawbacks, including exposure to the air pollution from burning which could result in severe health issues.  Burning clothing could impact climate change by emitting hazardous gasses. One benefit is that all the chemicals in clothes can be converted into fuel and energy for cogeneration, which can be heating or electricity.

The carbon neutrality of wool and other natural fibers means that they can take in as much gas as they create, if not more. 

The Experiment 

The experiment is to test wool, denim, silk, and cotton after incineration for how the textiles can potentially aid plants in growth. Polyester and nylon were excluded from this test because they are mainly synthetic fibers and, proven by our previous experiment, they would not be a helpful fertilizer for plants. 

The plant we used in our experiment is called the common bean or Phaseolus vulgaris.  Legumes such as beans have a long shelf life and are nutrient packed, which results in a lower carbon footprint for the world. They are popular because beans are high in iron, thiamin, and riboflavin, which provides quality inexpensive protein. Each pod contains four to twelve seeds packed with nutrients. They are used for treatment for diabetes and kidney problems, being very helpful to the human body. 

One of the reasons why beans are commonly used is because of its sustainable nature. The common bean absorbs nitrogen in the air and fixes about 60 million metric tons into the soil with the symbiosis of a nitrogen-fixing bacteria called rhizobia. Due to the fact that this fertilizer is high in nitrogen, adding more will overdose the chemicals in the plant. This natural fertilizer saves approximately 40 billion US dollars that would’ve gone to farming fertilizers. 

In addition to natural fertilizer, the process of harvesting beans is also environmentally friendly. Beans have a stable moisture content so no drying is necessary. In turn, less fossil fuels and harmful gasses are emitted from not using drying machines. Phaseolus vulgaris can survive drought with its own stable moisture, making them easy to access for most of the planet. 

Other Solutions 

Following the plastic recycling model, a similar process could be applied to textiles where first items of clothing in good condition that are resellable could be identified and shipped to secondary markets. Those deemed to be non-desirable can then be sorted based on their fiber blends. Clothing made from 100% natural fibers like wool or cotton could be broken down and remade into new garments or potentially naturally decomposed through the use of fungi, bacteria or moths. Alternatively these materials can be thrown away in a landfill here in Canada rather than shipped across the globe.

“The bottom line is that we need to produce and consume less”( Liz Ricketts, cofounder of the OR Foundation, 2021)  Influencing the government to impose taxes on lower-quality or synthetic fiber apparel is an alternate method to decrease consumption. Taxation and legislation has been used for many years to change the behaviors of the public. For instance, if garments are made with the use of  polyester or nylon fibers and are taxed at a higher rate than cotton or wool, more individuals will opt to purchase eco-friendly fabrics. If there is less demand for clothing made of synthetic fibers the production of these items would decrease resulting in less waste. Additionally if items made from these fabrics were more expensive perhaps people wouldn’t be so quick to throw them away following changing fashion trends.  

Conclusion

A prosperous country like Canada shouldn't dump its trash into an underdeveloped nation like Africa. It isn't helping those areas because the garbage accumulates on the beaches and in its waterways and ocean, damaging the life and creatures that live there. North America and other countries have the financial resources to construct their own material recycling or incineration facilities for the disposal of unwanted textiles. In conclusion, educating ourselves on what happens to our unwanted clothes will hopefully change future behaviors and make us more accountable for what we buy, how we use it and most importantly how we dispose of it. 

 

Variables

Manipulated

the type of ash in the fertilizer (wool, cotton, denim, silk)

Responding

 Qualitative- how healthy the plant looks at

Quantitative- how big the plant is (cm and using measuring tape) and how many leaves the plant has 

Controlled

  • Type of original soil
  • Type of plant
  • Amount of water
  • Amount of sunlight
  • Time of watering
  • Time of measurement
  • Type of pot
  • Time of planting
  • Location in house
  • Distance from windows or other openings

Procedure

  1. Bean plants (10 or more)
  2. Pots (10)
  3. Soil 
  4. Wool ash
  5. Denim ash
  6. Silk ash
  7. Cotton ash

Observations

DATA

January 18th

TYPE OF ASH
HEIGHT OF PLANT 
OBSERVATIONS AND PHOTO 

Cotton 

O cm 

No growth this far

Cotton Blue 

O cm 

No growth this far

Denim 

O cm 

No growth this far

Denim Blue

O cm 

No growth this far

Wool 

O cm 

No growth this far

Wool Blue

O cm 

No growth this far

Silk 

O cm 

No growth this far

Silk Blue

O cm 

No growth this far

DAY #10 January 27

TYPE OF ASH
HEIGHT OF PLANT 
OBSERVATIONS AND PHOTO 

Cotton 

0cm

No growth this far

Cotton Blue 

0cm

No growth this far

Denim 

0cm

No growth this far

Denim Blue

Not measurable, just visible

Sprouted, visible growth

Wool 

0cm

No growth this far

Wool Blue

0cm

No growth this far

Silk 

Not measurable, just visible

Sprouted, visible growth

Silk Blue

0cm

No growth this far


 

DAY #13 January 24th

TYPE OF ASH
HEIGHT OF PLANT 
OBSERVATIONS AND PHOTO 

Cotton 

0cm

No growth this far

Cotton Blue 

0cm

No growth this far

Denim 

0cm

No growth this far

Denim Blue

4cm

Sprouted, visible growth

Wool 

0cm

No growth this far

Wool Blue

0cm

No growth this far

Silk 

Not measurable, just visible

Sprouted, visible growth

Silk Blue

0cm

No growth this far

Control

0cm

No growth this far

Control Blue

Not measurable, just visible

Sprouted, visible growth

 

DAY #16 January 27th

TYPE OF ASH
HEIGHT OF PLANT 
OBSERVATIONS AND PHOTO 

Cotton 

Not measurable, just sprouting 

Growing!

Cotton Blue 

2cm

No observations

Denim 

Not measurable, just sprouting 

Growing!

Denim Blue

14cm

2 leaves, very tall 

Wool 

Not measurable, just sprouting 

Growing!

Wool Blue

Ocm 

No growth so far

Silk 

Not measurable, just sprouting 

Growing!

Silk Blue

Not measurable, just sprouting 

Growing!

Control 

Not measurable, just sprouting 

Growing!

Control Blue

Ocm 

No growth so far

 

DAY #19 January 30th

TYPE OF ASH
HEIGHT OF PLANT 
OBSERVATIONS AND PHOTO 

Cotton 

3cm

0 leaves but is a healthy green color

Cotton Blue 

16cm

2 medium leaves, healthy growth

Denim 

7cm

2 small leaves, nice green color

Denim Blue

20cm

2 very large leaves, largest plant so far

Wool 

5cm

0 leaves, healthy start to growth

Wool Blue

0cm

No growth so far

Silk 

8cm

1 leaf, healthy start to growth

Silk Blue

4cm

1 leaf, good growth so far 

Control

7cm

2 leaves, healthy green color

Control Blue

0cm

No growth so far
 

 

DAY #22 Febuary 2nd

TYPE OF ASH
HEIGHT OF PLANT 
OBSERVATIONS AND PHOTO 

Cotton 

11cm

0 leaves 

Cotton Blue 

21cm

2 big leaves

Denim 

19cm

2 leaves

Denim Blue

23cm

2 big leaves

Wool 

19cm

2 leaves

Wool Blue

Just peeking through

No observations

Silk 

16 cm

2 leaves

Silk Blue

17cm 

2 leaves

Control

19m

2 leaves

Control

Ocm 

No observations 


 

DAY #25 Febuary 5th

TYPE OF ASH
HEIGHT OF PLANT 
OBSERVATIONS AND PHOTO 

Cotton 

15cm 

0 leaves 

Cotton Blue 

23cm 

Many holes in the 2 leaves 

Denim 

25cm 

2 big leaves 

Denim Blue

25cm 

2 big sized leaves 

Wool 

23cm

One medium sized leaf 

Wool Blue

Ocm 

No observations 

Silk 

15cm

One medium sized leaf 

Silk Blue

19cm

One medium sized leaf 

Control

22cm 

Very tall and healthy

Control Blue

21cm

Very tall and healthy



DAY #28 Febuary 8th

TYPE OF ASH
HEIGHT OF PLANT 
OBSERVATIONS AND PHOTO 

Cotton 

13cm 

0 leaves 

Cotton Blue 

19 cm

Prominent holes in the 2 leaves 

Denim 

25cm 

2 big leaves 

Denim Blue

27cm 

2 big leaves  

Wool 

2 cm 

No observations 

Wool Blue

23cm 

2 medium sized leaves 

Silk 

18cm 

2 medium sized leaves 

Silk Blue

16cm 

2 medium sized leaves 

Control 

27 cm 

2 small leaves 

Control Blue 

21cm 

2 big sized leaves 



DAY #31 Febuary 11th

TYPE OF ASH
HEIGHT OF PLANT 
OBSERVATIONS AND PHOTO 

Cotton 

14cm 

0 leaves 

Cotton Blue 

23 cm

Prominent holes in the 2 leaves (small)

Denim 

26cm 

2 big leaves 

Denim Blue

30cm 

4 big leaves  

Wool 

3cm 

No observations 

Wool Blue

26cm 

2 medium sized leaves 2 small sized leaves

Silk 

22cm 

2 medium sized leaves 

Silk Blue

18cm 

2 big sized leaves 2 small leaves

Control 

28 cm 

2 small leaves 

Control Blue 

26cm 

2 big sized leaves 



DAY #37 Febuary 17th

TYPE OF ASH
HEIGHT OF PLANT 
OBSERVATIONS AND PHOTO 

Cotton 

16cm 

2 leaves 

Cotton Blue 

29 cm

Prominent holes in the 2 leaves 

Denim 

30cm 

2 big leaves 3 small leaves 

Denim Blue

39cm 

2 big leaves 3 small leaves

Wool 

2 cm 

No observations  (NOT USING DATA)

Wool Blue

32cm 

5 medium sized leaves 

Silk 

30cm 

5 medium sized leaves 

Silk Blue

18cm 

2 medium sized leaves 

Control 

30 cm 

4 medium sized leaves 

Control Blue 

29cm 

2 big sized leaves 

 

Analysis

Denim reached an average height of  34.5 centimeters, it was the first bean plant to sprout after 11 days and was the tallest plant. Silk reached an average of 25 cm and wool grew to a total height of 32 cm. When cotton was growing, we noticed that the leaves had some holes and white spots which faded over time and the average height of these plants were 22.5 cm. All plants started to grow approximately 10-15 days after planting.  Based on these results, we can confirm the ash doesn’t negatively affect the starting growth time of the plants or the overall quality or size of the bean plants.  The controlled plant which was plain potting soil was the last to sprout.

Other than cotton, all the other plants grew healthily and green. The control plant and wool had the thickest stems while cotton had the thinnest and weakest stem.  

The control plant and silk had the most leaves but denim had the largest leaves. 

 

 

Conclusion

The hypothesis was that the plants with the clothing ash will result in healthier growth than the plants without the ash because the incinerated clothing will provide nutrients for the plant. 

One prediction was that the plant with the wool's ash will grow the healthiest and tallest because it is the least processed and comes from an animal and is more nutrient rich.  Meanwhile the plant with denim’s ash will grow the shortest in length because it is the most processed. 
 
The tallest plant was denim and the shortest was cotton which was a very interesting finding because both fabrics are cotton.  It's likely that the processing of denim versus cotton has some effect once turned to ash. Denim provided a richer fertilizer than cotton potentially due to the chemical process of making cotton into denim or because it is a heavier woven fabric and was denser fertilizer.   
 
Considering this data, we can conclude that the only clothing ash that potentially affected the plant was cotton because the plant grew short and the leaves had holes. In saying this, we now know that wool, silk, and denim ash can be effectively applied to soil on farms and in gardens. This occurred because the plants that grew the tallest were combined with ash that wasn’t very processed. By burning these fabrics, we are going to see a huge decrease in the amount of physical clothing waste in Africa because over 60% of fashion garbage can now be successfully incinerated and used as fertilizer. 

Application

We experimented with different textiles to find an environmentally safe way to dispose of unwanted clothing. We have habitually and yet still dumped our pollution in developing nations. This is harmful to the environment  because textile waste, microplastics, and toxic chemicals, made by dyeing garments, gather in waterways and the ocean. This damages all nature and life. Clogged gutter systems can also cause floods frequently. Given that municipal landfills are running out of space and that textile waste takes a long time to decompose, it is not the greatest solution. In reality, the North continent’s nations send their clothing to Africa primarily because they don't want to manage their own waste. Additionally, citizens believe that there is a shortage of clothing in the South. Very little percent of the population is aware of the reality. They constantly donate clothes thinking that they would end up to good use. We seek a fast and effective method of disposing of our old clothing. Our study will raise awareness of the issue with recycling and identify more environmentally friendly fabrics and disposal methods. 

 

Sources Of Error

 During this project, we believe our only source of error was only using one trial for the wool plant. This plant started growing quite late and only grew a total height of 5cm. We decided that the best decision was to not use this information as the other wool plant was over 30cm tall. For the average we are just using the height of the tall plant. If this plant had grown, it would have made our results more reliable. Additionally, we would like to start our experiment earlier next year because growing plants takes a long time.

Citations

Bibliography

“A Simple Guide To Eco-Friendly Fabrics And Where To Shop Them.” VETTA, https://www.vettacapsule.com/blogs/blog/your-guide-to-eco-friendly-fabrics. Accessed 4 January 2023.]

Batista, Candice. “The Lowdown on Nylon: Is it an Eco-Friendly, Sustainable Fabric?” The Eco Hub, 30 June 2022, https://theecohub.com/nylon-eco-friendly-sustainable-fabric/. Accessed 4 January 2023.

Castro-Guerrero, Norma A., Mariel C. Isidra-Arellano, David G. Mendoza-Cozatl, and Oswaldo Valdés-López. “Common Bean: A Legume Model on the Rise for Unraveling Responses and Adaptations to Iron, Zinc, and Phosphate Deficiencies.” Frontiers, April 18, 2016. Accessed January 27, 2024. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2016.00600/full. 

“Common Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris).” Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) | Safety Assessment of Foods and Feeds Derived from Transgenic Crops, Volume 3 : Common bean, Rice, Cowpea and Apple Compositional Considerations | OECD iLibrary. Accessed January 27, 2024. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/544d03d6-en/index.html

Dang, Christina. “Spandex is Elastic but the Environment is Not.” AndHerShop, 10 August 2022, https://www.andher.us/blogs/news/spandex. Accessed 4 January 2023.

Dowding, Jessica. “What Are the Best Eco-Friendly Fabrics? A Complete Guide.” Wild Minimalist, 9 September 2021, https://wildminimalist.com/blogs/news/what-are-the-best-eco-friendly-fabrics-your-complete-guide-to-16-common-materials. Accessed 4 January 2023.

Durfee, Nell, et al. “The troubled second life of donated clothes.” Scienceline, 6 June 2018, https://scienceline.org/2018/06/the-troubled-second-life-of-donated-clothes/. Accessed 4 January 2023.

“Environmental Research about Meatless Monday.” The Monday Campaigns, March 10, 2022. Accessed January 27, 2024. https://www.mondaycampaigns.org/meatless-monday/research/environment. 

Hertantyo, Stella. “The Truth About What Happens to Donated Clothes.” Conscious Life and Style, 27 October 2021, https://www.consciouslifeandstyle.com/what-happens-to-donated-clothes/. Accessed 4 January 2023.

 Heuzé V., Tran G., Nozière PLebas F. “Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris).”  Feedipedia. INRAE, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO. October 20, 2015. Accessed January 27, 2024. https://www.feedipedia.org/node/266

“How to Recycle Clothes That Can't Be Repaired, Donated or Resold.” ClosettCandyy, https://www.closettcandyy.ca/post/how-to-recycle-clothes-that-can-t-be-repaired-donated-or-resold. Accessed 31 January 2023.

Iannotti, Marie. “Common Beans: Plant Care & Growing Guide.” The Spruce, June 29, 2024. Accessed January 27, 2023. 

Jay, Paul. “Here's where your donated clothing really ends up.” CBC, 29 May 2018, https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/donated-clothing-where-it-ends-up-1.4662023. Accessed 4 January 2023.

Uebersax Mark A., Karen A. Chichy, Franscisco E. Gomez, Timothy G. Porch, et al. “Dry Beans (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) as a Vital Component of Sustainable ...” Wiley, June 9, 2022. Accessed January 27, 2024 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/leg3.155. 

Marshall, Shonagh. “A conversation with Liz Ricketts — Denier.” Denier, 30 July 2020, https://www.fashiondenier.com/conversations/a-conversation-with-liz-ricketts. Accessed 4 January 2023.

Mendes, Pedro. “How jeans became one of the most polluting garments in the world.” CBC, 13 September 2019, https://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/how-jeans-became-one-of-the-most-polluting-garments-in-the-world-1.5280773. Accessed 4 January 2023.

Osmanski, Stephanie. “How Fabric Gets Recycled.” Green Matters, 29 April 2020, https://www.greenmatters.com/p/how-fabric-gets-recycled. Accessed 4 January 2023.

Petruzzello, Melissa. “Bean.” Encyclopædia Britannica, February 15, 2024. Accessed January 27, 2024. https://www.britannica.com/plant/bean. 

“Phaseolus Vulgaris.” Phaseolus vulgaris - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics. Accessed February 19, 2024. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/phaseolus-vulgaris. 

Porter, Beth. “What Really Happens to Unwanted Clothes?” Green America, https://www.greenamerica.org/unraveling-fashion-industry/what-really-happens-unwanted-clothes. Accessed 4 January 2023.

RICKETTS, LIZ, and Branson Skinner. “Introduction.” Dead White Man's Clothes, https://deadwhitemansclothes.org/intro. Accessed 4 January 2023.

RICKETTS, LIZ. “Carrying Capacity.” Atmos, 11 July 2020, https://atmos.earth/kantamanto-market-ghana-clothing-waste-women. Accessed 4 January 2023.

RICKETTS, LIZ. “This Is Not Your Goldmine. This Is Our Mess.” Atmos, 30 January 2021, https://atmos.earth/fashion-clothing-waste-letter-ghana/. Accessed 4 January 2023.

“SMART Textile Recycling.” CT.gov, https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/DEEP/waste_management_and_disposal/Solid_Waste_Management_Plan/June2013/SMARTTextileRecyclingGroipenSWACJune2013pdf.pdf. Accessed 4 January 2023.

Weber, Sabine. “Opportunities for Textile Recycling - Waste & Recycling.” Solid Waste & Recycling, 6 July 2017, https://www.wasterecyclingmag.ca/feature/opportunities-for-textile-recycling/. Accessed 4 January 2023.

“Why wool is the best choice for the environment.” British Wool, https://www.britishwool.org.uk/why-wool-is-the-best-choice-for-the-environment. Accessed 4 January 2023.


 

 

Acknowledgement

We would like to aknowledge Mr. Balie and Mrs. Summerscales for helping us start our science fair journey and spark the idea for this project. We would also like to thank Mrs. Schmidt and our parents for allowing us to purchase materials and supplies.